NEW MEXICO - NMOHVA Lawsuit Update 4

Share on Facebook
June 21, 2013 9:59 AM


NEW MEXICO - NMOHVA Lawsuit Update 4

Dear BRC Members and Supporters in New Mexico,

BRC just received an email from the New Mexico Off Highway Vehicle Alliance (NMOHVA) with a Lawsuit Update. 

We've pasted NMOHVA's Lawsuit Update below. Please take a minute to read it over, and pass it along to friends, family and riding buddies.

As always, call or email if you have any questions or comments.

Ric Foster
Public Lands Department Manager
BlueRibbon Coalition
208-237-1008 ext 107

June 19, 2013

Judge DENIES Intervener Status
to 'Big Green' in the NMOHVA Lawsuit

We have received great news on our lawsuit challenging the Santa Fe National Forest Travel Management decision. The judge has DENIED intervener status to the "Big Green" gang who filed for intervener status in the case.  United States District Judge William Paul Johnson denied a request for intervener status, filed by the Center for Biological Diversity, WildEarth Guardians, and the Sierra Club (collectively called "the Center" in the judge's decision).  While denying intervener status to the green organizations doesn't have any direct bearing on the ultimate outcome of our case, it is still very big news.

In lawsuits such as ours, intervention allows a third party, called an "intervener", to join ongoing litigation.  This is at the discretion of the court and is done without the permission of the original parties (NMOHVA and the Forest Service) in the lawsuit. The rationale for intervention is that a judgment in a particular case may affect the rights of nonparties, whose interests are not adequately represented by the original parties in the suit.  The intervener can submit their own legal arguments to influence the judge's decision.

The judge's denial of the intervener status indicates that the judge is not favorably biased towards our opposition.  It would have been very easy to grant the motion.   The granting of intervener status to the environmental organizations is so common that we didn't even bother to challenge it.   But the Big Green litigation machine and its horde of lawyers didn't convince the judge.

Even more interesting is the reason why the judge denied the intervener status.  He essentially said that the Forest Service is already representing the green's anti-OHV viewpoint and he didn't need them cluttering up the case. Here's an excerpt from what the judge wrote:

"However, the Center also argues that the Forest Service will not adequately represent its interests, either-and this does not make sense to the Court. In designing and attempting to implement a Travel Plan which intends to curb the use of OHV on forest land, the Forest Service appears to be taking the position of environmental groups (such as the Center) voicing a concern for the environmental effect of OHV use on national forest land."

The judge goes on to explain that, "The Court is confident that the Forest Service will provide the Court with ample information and legal authority to support its position in this matter, and finds that additional briefing would not be helpful and perhaps may even distract from the issues at the center of this litigation."  You can read the judge's entire Order Denying the Motion to Intervene at NMOHVA's website (

This means that ONLY NMOHVA and the Forest Service are allowed to present their arguments in this case.  The judge will base his decision on the administrative record and the arguments made by only these two parties.  This is one case where Big Green will be sitting on the sidelines.



So far, with your help, we are two for two!  The Forest Service tried hard to keep some of the pertinent documents out of the Administrative Record.  NMOHVA kept up the pressure and eventually every single document we requested was added.  Now the judge has denied intervener status to the big and VERY well-funded green organizations.  We still have a very long ways to go but we have made a great start.  We don't have a huge war chest from big money foundations.  We don't have a lawsuit-factory law firm at our disposal.  NMOHVA is doing all this with only the grassroots support of our members and friends.   
So THANK YOU!!!!  Without you, none of this would be possible. 

You can DONATE online to the ACCESS DEFENSE FUND by simply "clicking" on the button below:





 The BlueRibbon Coalition is a national recreation group that champions responsible recreation, and encourages individual environmental stewardship. With members in all 50 states, BRC is focused on building enthusiast involvement with organizational efforts through membership, outreach, education, and collaboration among recreationists. 1-800-BlueRib -

As a non-profit, grassroots organization funded primarily by membership dues and donations, we greatly appreciate your support. Visit to help fund our efforts to protect your trails!

October 8, 2015 10:57 AM
BRC has just received Email Alerts from our partners at ARRA (Americans for Responsible Recreational Access) and at California Four Wheel Drive Association (Cal4Wheel) in regards to President Obama's plans to designate a massive new National Monument. Take a minute and read their Action Alert pasted below, then Take Action. President Obama and Secretary Jewell both need to hear from you. Both ARRA and Cal4Wheel have letter generators
October 2, 2015 11:12 AM
CALIFORNIA - BLM Reopens Public Comment Period for Draft West Mojave Planning Ar
On March 6, 2015, the Department of Interior, Bureau of Land Management (BLM), published in the Federal Register a notice of availability for comment on a Draft Land Use Plan Amendment (LUPA) and Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for the West Mojave Route Network Project (WMRNP) for the West Mojave (WEMO) Planning Area of the California Desert Conservation Area (CDCA), to amend the Motor Vehicle, Recreation, and Grazing Elements
October 1, 2015 3:32 PM
CALIFORNIA - Plumas NF Announces Proposed Action for Over-Snow Vehicle Use Desig
The Forest Service will prepare an environmental impact statement (EIS) on a proposal to designate over-snow vehicle (OSV) use on roads, trails and areas on lands within the Plumas National Forest. The EIS will also identify snow trails available for grooming on the Forest. Public input on the initial proposed action is encouraged. Designating OSV use on the Forest will ensure over-snow vehicle activity (such as snowmobile riding) is effectively managed to: provide access;
[Action Alerts Archive]