North Dakota RTP in Jeopardy - Please Help

Share on Facebook
June 17, 2013 3:57 PM

‬‬

Dear BRC Action Alert Subscriber in North Dakota,

This comes to us from Sno-Dak (Snowmobile North Dakota) via the Coalition for Recreational Trails.

SITUATION:
Snowmobile enthusiasts in North Dakota have just heard from Governor Dalrymple’s office that a meeting is scheduled for July 9th to determine whether or not he will opt out of the Recreational Trails Program (RTP) for the next fiscal year.

If the Governor does not opt out, North Dakota trails will receive slightly more than $1 million in RTP funding next year. If he does opt out, your gas tax you spend on your snowmobile and OHV will be spent for other purposes!

WHAT YOU NEED TO DO
Now is the time for North Dakota trail interests to contact the Governor and let him know how important the RTP is to the future of trails in the state.

Sno-Dak has a really cool action item on their website to help you write Governor Dalrymple. Please use their action item or write your own letter and send it to the Governor today!

Save the Recreational Trail Program (Click here)

We've also pasted Sno-Dak's sample letter below.

As always, please call or email if you have any questions or need additional information.

Thanks in advance for taking action!
Brian Hawthorne
Public Lands Policy Director
BlueRibbon Coalition
208-237-1008 ext 102

 


Office of Governor Jack Dalrymple
Dept. 101
600 E. Boulevard Ave.
Bismarck, ND 58505-0001
Fax: 701/328-2205

Dear Governor Dalrymple,

I am writing to you to encourage you NOT to opt out of the Recreational Trails Program.

The Recreational Trails Program (RTP) funds the development and maintenance of recreational trails and facilities for motorized and non-motorized uses including hiking, bicycling, equestrian use, dirt bike riding, ATV riding, and other recreational uses.  The program derives its funding from only a portion (less than 50%) of the Federal gas taxes collected at the pump when off-highway recreation enthusiasts fill up their machines.  The RTP is based on the user-pay, user-benefit philosophy as taxes collected on fuel used on trails benefit trails.  By statute 30% of the funds are to be used for motorized recreation, 30% for non-motorized recreation, with the remaining 40% to be used for multiple-use projects.  RTP was created by the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991 (ISTEA) and has been subsequently included in each succeeding transportation reauthorization legislation, including the Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act (MAP-21) signed by the President in July 2012. 

Key Reasons for a State NOT to Opt Out of the Recreational Trails Program

  • The state will lose access to significant additional dollars in partner funding, including additional funds from non-DOT Federal partners, as well as in-kind services, including the work of volunteers, that RTP funding has traditionally leveraged to support RTP-funded projects.
  • Projects in the state will no longer be exempt from treatment as projects on a Federal-aid highway, which will mean increased costs.
  • The state will lose the funding flexibility allowed by RTP and will be unable to spend funds directly for state-approved projects.
  • Nonprofit organizations and other private-sector partners will no longer be eligible to receive direct funding from the state, limiting a key means of cost-effective project management.
  • Funding of trail maintenance and program administration will no longer be authorized.
  • The state Recreational Trails Advisory Committee, representing all state trail users in the oversight and planning of projects, will be essentially eliminated and the value of the members’ cooperation and input will be lost.
  • Federal support will be lost for key programs like the RTP database and technical assistance, research and training directly related to the program’s administration, which are all underwritten by a return to the DOT of one percent of state RTP funds.
  • The clear link between the RTP, which is funded by Federal gas taxes, and the trail enthusiasts, who pay those taxes, will be lost, denying those users the assurance that benefits they paid for will be received.
       
    RTP is the foundation for state trail programs across the country. Its loss would seriously damage, if not destroy, a state trail program.  RTP is a flexible, responsive, proven program that leverages hundreds of millions of dollars of additional support from other sources for trails, encourages productive cooperation among trail users, and facilitates healthy outdoor recreation and associated, badly needed economic activity in countless communities.  There are thousands of great RTP projects across the country.  For examples, visit www.americantrails.org/rtp/crtawards.html.
February 25, 2015 4:00 PM
ARIZONA - BLM Extends La Posa Travel Management Plan Comment Period
The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) Yuma Field Office La Posa Travel Management Plan (TMP) comment period has been extended for an extra 30 days to Monday, March 23, 2015. The preliminary EA may be reviewed on the BLM internet website at http://www.blm.gov/az/st/en/prog/travel_mgmt/la_posa.html. ***BRC wants to alert folks to pay particular attention to the designation or non-designation of routes that traverse washes or are in the wash itself. Highlight importance of wash-based OHV
February 23, 2015 3:29 PM
CALIFORNIA & NEVADA - Tahoe NF Announces Proposed Action for Over-Snow Vehicle U
The Forest Service will prepare an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) on a proposal to designate Over-Snow Vehicle (OSV) use on roads, trails and areas on lands within the Tahoe National Forest. The EIS will also identify snow trails available for grooming on the Forest. Public input on the initial proposed action is encouraged. The Tahoe National Forest maintains a world-class OSV trail system. Designating OSV use on the Forest will ensure over-snow vehicle activity, such as snowmobile riding, 
February 19, 2015 12:20 PM
BRC National Land Use Update - February 19, 2015
Send an Email Urging Your Representative to Cosponsor H.R. 999 -- The ROV In-Depth Examination Act - Last November, BRC's Don Amador, a SXS enthusiast, asked you to contact Congress because federal regulators were trying to impose their "street-oriented" view on SXS users and the industry by proposing a Rule which could have devastated SXS recreation. Your efforts did help delay imposition of the Rule, but the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) is
[Action Alerts Archive]